Track Record

The whole book. Nothing hidden.

Every figure below is the real, live free base-staking track on real historical bookmaker odds — no data used to build the signals was reused to validate them. Historical results are not a guarantee of future performance.

Combined ROI

+8.5%

Total signals

1,881

Seasons backtested

Real bankroll, in units

Start 500u · base staking · free · chronological across both seasons

1296.5u

+159.3% total return

Peak-to-trough drawdownReal weekly results, both seasons

The base staking curve is the free strategy — level stakes, lower variance, open to everyone. Advanced, Conservative, and Risky are Pro features: the same signals, staked to bankroll-relative rules of increasing intensity. See Betting strategies below for exactly what each one means.

Risk, shown honestly

19.5%

Max drawdown of peak

8.2x

Return-to-drawdown

Never

Depleted the bankroll

This scheme compounds aggressively — it will have real losing stretches, and could give back most of its peak before recovering. The point is the two-season trend, not any single week.

Season by season

2024–25 ROI+5.5%

2025–26 ROI+11.5%

Combined ROI+8.5%

Performance by market

Four signals, real results.

Each signal type is tracked independently across the home, away and draw markets. They’re built on very different sample sizes.

SignalSampleROI

Away Market

Away

436

+10.8%

Draw Market

Draw

1098

+6.6%

Home Market

Signal 1

116

+21.5%

Home Market

Signal 2

231

+6.6%

Signal names are intentionally generic — the underlying methodology is not disclosed. Figures are real, live results, not a per-user guarantee; odds move.

Betting strategies

Two ways to size a bet, backtested honestly.

The Advanced track sizes every qualifying signal the same weekly stake by default. We also researched sizing each bet by its own odds bucket instead — more on historically stronger odds ranges, less on weaker ones. Pro subscribers can pick any of the three as a suggested stake per signal on the Live Signals dashboard.

Strategyvs. Advanced stakingMax drawdownWorst week

Advanced

Default, Pro subscribers

—

58.1%

−36.1%

Conservative

Pro

+17.3%

58.1%

−38.0%

Risky

Pro

+80.0%

59.7%

−47.7%

Read this honestly, not as a sure thing: both figures come from one out-of-sample test — bucket weights derived from the 2024-25 season only, then applied to 2025-26 results that weren’t used to derive them. That’s real evidence, not a guarantee: it’s a single validation on two seasons of data. Risky in particular carries measurably higher drawdown risk for its larger backtested return — it’s named Risky on purpose. Conservative was chosen specifically because it showed no meaningful increase in drawdown over flat staking.

How we validate a signal before it goes live

Every signal type is tested for consistency across multiple seasons of real historical odds before it’s ever added — and validated on data that was never used to build it. We only publish a market once it clears that bar. We don’t show why a given signal fired: the process is transparent, the model is not for sale.